海南大学学报(社会科学版)

出于节省资源、提高效率的部门利益需要,不少防卫人被作为"斗殴"追究刑事责任;司法机关往往按照"不得已"标准考量防卫人的行为性质;防卫人在罪犯逃离现场从而获得防卫机会时进行防卫,往往被一刀切地认定为"防卫不适时";公、检、法受理防卫类案件的程序和特点,使得防卫人经常被定性为"伤害(杀人)"而得不到制度性的制约和救济,最终,形成公民不能、不愿行使防卫权之困局。破解对策为:规范涉及"斗殴"定性处理相关案件的程序和要求;明确不得按照"不得已"标准判定行为性质;确定犯罪嫌疑人携赃物逃离现场行为性质为"正在进行";对"扭送权"相关内容及其范围、对象和损害后果之责任,以司法解释的形式加以明确和细化,使其切实可行。

In order to meet the department interest need of saving resources and boosting efficiency,many defenders are taken as "assaulting" and ascertained their criminal responsibility;judicial organs usually verify the behavior nature of defenders according to the principle of "reluctance";defenders only have the opportunities to defend themselves when the criminals fled,thus they are absolutely accused as "untimely defense";the procedure and characteristics of the accepted cases of the public organs make the defenders often be regarded as "harm(murder),thus unable to be restrained or relieved from institutions.Finally,the dilemma that citizens are not able and not willing to use their defense rights formed.The solutions are as follows: to specify the procedure and requirements of the related cases of "assaulting";to clarify that the behavior nature should not be ascertained by "reluctance";to make certain that the criminal "fleeing with booty" is "crime in progress";to clarify and specify the judicial explanation of the content,scope,target person,and the responsibility of "arresting right" to make it feasible.