| 1,031 | 3 | 250 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
作为强奸罪的加重处罚事由,轮奸的成立是否要有人奸淫既遂,轮奸有无既未遂,有人奸淫既遂、有人未遂应如何处置,是轮奸司法认定过程中要解决的三大问题。对此,学理和实务主张莫衷一是。加重处罚轮奸的实质依据在于轮奸共同正犯实施数个奸淫行为侵害同一被害人数个同质性自主权,轮奸行为本身的不法程度高于帮助、教唆下的单个奸淫行为,也高于后者作为共犯之整体的行为不法,轮奸的成立仅要求存在二个奸淫行为而不以有人奸淫既遂为必要。《刑法》第236条第1款规定的强奸罪是复行为犯,奸淫目的实现具有可替代性,强奸并非内涵和外延均不清晰的亲手犯,该理论也无力解决轮奸认定问题。轮奸是情节加重犯,有不同于基本强奸的加重构成要件,本身有既未遂形态。二人以上轮奸,均未得逞的,是轮奸未遂;一人既遂,其余人未遂的,整体轮奸既遂。
Abstract:As an aggravating punishment for rape, whether one commits the accomplished rape, gang rape itself is accomplished or attempted, and some commit the accomplished rape while others the attempted rape determines the establishment of gang rape, constituting three major issues to be solved in the judicial determination of gang rape. No consensus has been reached between the academic field and the practical operations. The substantial basis for aggravating the punishment of gang rape lies in the fact that the co-principal of the gang rape commits several acts of rape, infringing upon the homogenous autonomy of the same victim. The illegality of gang rape itself is more serious than a single rape with helper or instigator. It is also more serious than the illegality of the latter as a whole. The establishment of gang rape only requires the existence of two acts of rape and does not require that someone has completed. The rape stipulated in Paragraph 1 of Article 236 of the Criminal Law is a double-acting crime, and the realization of the purpose of rape is substitutable. Rape is not the personal offense whose connotation and extension are unclear, and this theory is also unable to solve the problem of gang rape determination. Gang rape is an aggravated offense by circumstances, which has the aggravating elements different from the basic rape, and itself has the forms of the accomplished and attempted. If a gang rape committed by two or more people fails, it is determined as the attempted; if one commits the accomplished rape, and the others are attempted, the overall gang rape is determined as the accomplished.
[1]王作富.刑法分则实务研究[M].北京:中国方正出版社,2013:768.
[2]付立庆.论轮奸的限制性认定[J].法学,2020(04):103-121.
[3]陈洪兵.“二人以上轮奸”的认定[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2012(06):69-75.
[4]周光权.刑法各论:第4版[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2021:37.
[5]张明楷.刑法学:第6版[M].北京:法律出版社,2021.
[6]高铭暄.中华人民共和国刑法的孕育诞生和发展完善[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:453.
[7]何洋.强奸罪:解构与运用[M].北京:法律出版社,2014:328.
[8]李勋文.轮奸情节的司法认定[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2015(02):110-112.
[9]钱叶六.“轮奸”情节认定中的争议问题探讨[J].江淮论坛,2010(05):116-122+172.
[10]谭德周.刑法性犯罪历次修正原因之探讨[D].中国台北:台湾大学,2004.
[11]吴情树.强奸罪中“轮奸”情节的司法认定[J].中华女子学院学报,2009(02):27-31.
[12]林贵文.“轮奸”成立学说的法教义学批判与证成[J].法律科学,2019(06):55-69.
[13]许玉秀.妨害性自主之强制、乘机与利用权势——何谓性自主?[J].中国台湾本土法学杂志,2003(42):16-36.
[14] MARTIN S.Binnenstrafrechtsdogmatik und ihre Grenzen[J].ZStW,1988,110(4):827-847.
[15]蔡惠芳.结果加重犯之未遂问题[G]//自由、责任与法——苏俊雄教授七秩祝寿论文集.中国台北:元照出版有限公司,2005:116.
[16]李圣伟.刑法第二二二条第一项第一款“二人以上共同犯之”之适用思考[J].政大法学评论,2010(115):1-54.
(1)(2016)京0102刑初344号刑事判决书,其终审判决(2017)京02刑终155号刑事判决书,改变了前一判决不适用“部分实行、全部责任”将强奸中止的被告人认定为普通强奸罪中止的认定,被告人最终被认定为普通强奸罪既遂,但与实施了轮奸的其余2名被告人并不构成轮奸。
(1)(2015)鄂汉江中刑终字第00017号刑事判决书;(2015)浙杭刑终字第585号刑事判决书。
(2)2017年6月5日23时许,被告人赵永江、李建强将醉酒的被害人龙某带至苏州工业园区某宾馆内。后被告人赵永江、李建强趁被害人龙某处于醉酒状态、无反抗能力之际,欲强行与被害人龙某发生性关系,均因意志外的原因而未得逞。(2017)苏0591刑初549号刑事判决书。
(1)德国1997年修法,将原第177条规定的强奸罪修正为性强制罪,其所规制的是性的行为(包括旧法规定的猥亵和强奸),不过原强奸罪所规制的奸淫(Beischlaf)成为加重处罚样态之一,其他加重处罚样态则是类似的奸淫行为,其包括肛交、口交、以物侵入阴道或肛门的行为。
(2)Sch?nke/Schr?der,St GB,27.Aufl.,2006,§117,Rn.3.
(1)(2016)渝04刑再3号刑事判决书。
(2)参见(2016)渝04刑再3号刑事判决书。
(3)参见(2018)闽0403刑初46号刑事判决书。
基本信息:
DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202112.1509
中图分类号:D924.34
引用信息:
[1]王焕婷.轮奸司法认定的法理逻辑——兼评强奸是亲手犯的理论主张[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,42(01):137-146.DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202112.1509.
基金信息:
国家社会科学后期基金项目(21FFXB072)
2022-12-15
2022-12-15
2022-12-15