| 1,871 | 21 | 156 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
通过理论阐释环境规制在经济发展水平视角下影响能源利用效率的非线性传导机制，运用超效率SBM模型测算我国省域能源利用效率，利用面板门槛模型实证检验环境规制对能源利用效率的影响效果。研究表明：随着经济发展水平的提高，环境规制对我国能源利用效率的影响存在门槛效应，二者之间呈U型非线性关系。环境规制对能源利用效率的影响因地区经济发达程度的不同而存在差异。机制分析发现，环境规制在不同经济发展水平下对绿色技术创新、产业结构高级化及能源消费结构的影响均存在与基准回归结果一致的U型特征。文章为推动我国实现环境保护和能效提升的双赢局面提供了具有参考价值的经验证据和政策启示。
Abstract：Theoretically explaining the nonlinear transmission mechanism that the environmental regulation impacts the efficiency of energy utilization from the perspective of economic development level, the paper uses the Super-SBM model to calculate the efficiency of provincial energy utilization in China, and utilizes the panel threshold model to empirically test the impacts of the environmental regulation on the efficiency of energy utilization. As the results show, there is a threshold effect on the impact of the environmental regulation on the efficiency of China's energy utilization with the improvement of economic development level, and there is a U-shaped nonlinear relationship between the two. The impact of the environmental regulation on the efficiency of energy utilization varies with the degree of regional economic development. The mechanism analysis shows that the impacts of the environmental regulation on green technology innovation, industrial structure upgrading and energy consumption structure under the different economic development levels have a U-shaped feature consistent with the benchmark regression results. It provides valuable empirical evidence and policy implications for promoting the win-win situation of environmental protection and energy efficiency improvement in China.
[1] PORTER M E, LINDE C V D. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitive relationship[J].Journal of economic perspectives, 1995, 9(4):97-118.
[2] PAN X, AI B, LI C, et al. Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, technological innovation and energy efficiency based on large scale provincial panel data in China[J]. Technological forecasting and social change, 2019, 144:428-435.
[3]林伯强,王喜枝,杜之利.环境规制对中国工业能源效率的影响[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021(4):30-42.
[4]杨志江,朱桂龙.技术创新、环境规制与能源效率[J].研究与发展管理,2017,29(4):23-32.
[5] CURTIS E M, LEE J M. When do environmental regulations backfire? onsite industrial electricity generation, energy efficiency and policy instruments[J]. Journal of environmental economics and management, 2019, 96:174-194
[6]李颖,徐小峰,郑越.环境规制强度对中国工业全要素能源效率的影响[J].管理评论,2019,31(12):40-48.
[7] WU H, HAO Y, REN S. How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency:Evidence from China[J]. Energy economics, 2020, 91:104880.
[8]陶长琪,李翠,王夏欢.环境规制对全要素能源效率的作用效应与能源消费结构演变的适配关系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(4):98-108.
[9]王腾,严良,何建华等.环境规制影响全要素能源效率的实证研究:基于波特假说的分解验证[J].中国环境科学, 2017(4):1571-1578.
[10]周四军,罗欣,刘影等.环境规制强度影响能源效率的门槛效应研究[J].经济数学,2020,37(1):9-19.
[11]韩国高,王昱博.环境税对OECD国家制造业产能利用率的效应研究[J].产业经济研究,2020(2):87-101.
[12]穆献中,周文韬,胡广文.不同类型环境规制对全要素能源效率的影响[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(3):56-74.
[13] PLOEG F, WITHAGEN C.Is there really a green paradox?[J]. Journal of environmental economics&management, 2012, 64(3):342-363.
[14]王为东,王冬,卢娜.中国碳排放权交易促进低碳技术创新机制的研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(2):41-48.
[15]薛飞,周民良.用能权交易制度能否提升能源利用效率?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(1):54-66.
[16] HANSEN B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation, testing, and inference[J].Journal of econometrics,1999.
[17] TONE K. A hybrid measure of efficiency in DEA[J]. Grips research report, 2004.
[18]陈诗一.中国各地区低碳经济转型进程评估[J].经济研究,2012,47(8):32-44.
[19] ZHANG N, CHOI Y. Total-factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China:a metafrontier nonradial Malmquist index analysis[J]. Energy economics, 2013; 40:549-559.
[20] ZHANG N,ZHOU P,KUNG C C. Total-factor carbon emission performance of the Chinese transportation industry:a bootstrapped nonradial Malmquist index analysis-ScienceDirect[J]. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2015, 41:584-593.
[21]彭代彦,张俊.环境规制对中国全要素能源效率的影响研究[J].工业技术经济,2019,38(2):59-67.
[22]史丹,李少林.排污权交易制度与能源利用效率[J].中国工业经济,2020(9):5-23.
[23]张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
[24] SHAN Y, LIU J, LIU Z, et al. New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors[J]. Applied energy, 2016, 184(DEC.15):742-750.
[25]郭然,原毅军.环境规制、研发补贴与产业结构升级[J].科学学研究,2020,38(12):2140-2149.
[26]赵文霞,刘洪愧.中国环境贸易措施与企业绿色创新[J].国际贸易问题,2022(3):105-120.
[27]付凌晖.我国产业结构高级化与经济增长关系的实证研究[J].统计研究,2010,27(8):79-81.
[28]王小鲁,樊纲,胡李鹏.中国分省份市场化指数报告[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2019.
[29] ZHANG J, LIU Y, YUAN C, et al. Industrial eco-efficiency in China:a provincial quantification using three-stage data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2017, 143:238-249.
(1)Sinn于2008年首次提出绿色悖论效应，认为由于面临环境规制的企业短期内为维护经济效益而增加化石能源消费量，环境规制的实施会恶化能源消费结构，造成适得其反的效果，出现环境治理悖论问题。
(1)因篇幅限制，内生性讨论和稳健性检验结果从略。
(1)发达地区为北京、天津、河北、辽宁、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、山东、广东、海南等11个东部省域。欠发达地区为山西、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北、湖南、重庆、四川、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、青海、广西、内蒙古、宁夏、新疆等19个中西部省域。
基本信息:
DOI：10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202306.0124
中图分类号:X32;F426.2
引用信息:
[1]郑展鹏,刘笑言,王雅柔.环境规制提高我国能源利用效率了吗？——基于面板门槛模型的分析[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,42(05):110-119.DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202306.0124.
基金信息:
河南省高等学校哲学社会科学基础研究重大项目（2021-JCZD-23）; 商务部国际贸易经济合作研究院与贵州财经大学联合基金项目（2017SWBZD05）
2023-06-09
2023
2023-08-13
2023-08-23
2023
1
2023-08-21
2023-08-21
2023-08-21