nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 05, v.42 184-195
论职场性骚扰行为的内部控制——以《民法典》1010条第2款具体构造与实施机制为核心
基金项目(Foundation): 司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(21SFB4050)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202108.2601
发布时间: 2023-06-13
出版时间: 2023-06-13
网络发布时间: 2023-06-13
移动端阅读
摘要:

MeToo运动及中国晚近多件知名公司董事、高管性骚扰丑闻案例表明:规制职场性失范,防止其对公司利益、股东权利的不利影响,抚慰失范行为对弱势群体所造创伤日益成为公司风险内控新的焦点与难题。虽然《民法典》进步性地新设第1010条“反性骚扰”条款并确立以合理“预防措施”“受理投诉措施”及“调查处置措施”三位一体的性骚扰私法内控应对机制,但对中国上交所和深交所共计近5000家上市公司披露的内控文件全景式实证研究表明这仅停留在象征性企业合规层面,职场性骚扰问题的解决终究走向受害主体无奈法外发声,进而迫使企业内部解决的规制理路。为此应以《民法典》1010条第2款为靶向,在尊重企业内控措施自治设置与建构模式自主选择的前提下,细化完善企业性骚扰内控措施的具体构成,运用立法论与解释论规则确立内外倒逼性内控措施实施机制成为解决职场性骚扰的关键所在。这不仅推动后MeToo时代企业风险内控中被忽视的性骚扰话题得到重视,也将进一步实现更为本质的性别平等与性别关怀。

Abstract:

The #MeToo movement and several recent cases of sexual harassment scandals involving directors and executives of well-known companies in China show that: regulating workplace sexual anomie, preventing its adverse impact on company interests and shareholders' rights, and soothing the trauma caused by anomie behavior to vulnerable groups has increasingly become a new challenge of corporate risk internal control.Although the progressive new Article 1010 "anti-sexual harassment" clause of the Civil Code and the establishment of a trinity of reasonable "preventive measures", "measures for accepting complaints" and "measures for investigation and handling" of sexual harassment private law internal control response mechanism,A panoramic empirical study of internal control documents disclosed by a total of 5,000 listed companiesshows that this is only at the symbolic level of corporate compliance, and the solution to workplace sexual harassment will eventually lead to the regulation that the victim has no choice but to speak out, and then force the company to resolve it internally.We should take the second paragraph of Article 1010 of the Civil Code as the target,and under the premise of respecting the autonomous setting and construction mode of corporate internal control measures, we should refine and improve the specific composition of corporate sexual harassment internal control measures, using legislative theory and interpretation theory. The key to solving sexual harassment in the workplace is to establish a mechanism for implementing internal and external control measures. This will not only promote the neglected topic of sexual harassment in corporate risk internal control in the postMeToo era, but also further realize more essential gender equality and gender care.

参考文献

[1]凯斯·R.桑斯坦.星球大战的世界[M].张力,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017:170.

[2]凯瑟琳·麦金农.性骚扰与性别歧视:职业女性困境剖析[M].赖慈芸,雷文玫,李金梅,译.台北:台北时报文化出版社,1993:122.

[3] RAMIT M. Sexual harassment law after#Metoo:looking to California as a model[J]. The yale law journal forum, 2018, 128:121-151.

[4]“工作场所中的性骚扰研究”课题组.工作场所中的性骚扰:多重权力和身份关系的不平等——对20个案例的调查和分析[J].妇女研究论丛,2009(06):22-31.

[5] KATAD A, MCINTOSHL A, et al. Corporate governance update:boards, sexual harassment, and gender diversity[EB/OL].(2018-01-26)[2023-05-04]. https://corpgov. law. harvard. edu/2018/01/26/corporate-governance-update-boards-sexual-harassment-and-gender-diversity.

[6]伯纳德·施瓦茨.美国法律史[M].王军,译.北京:法律出版社,2007:224-225.

[7] YUN M. The next phase in supporting women at work:balancing fiduciary duties and corporate legitimacy[J].The wisconsin journal of law, gender&society,2012,27(01):65-92.

[8] HESTER D M. Vulnerability as the human condition[J].Perspectives in biology&medicine,2015,58(04):466-474.

[9]张民安.公司法上的利益平衡[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004:2.

[10] WADEC L. Theimpact of U.S. corporate policy on women and people of color[J].Journal of gender,race and justice,2003,7(01):213-236.

[11]梁上上.论公司正义[J].现代法学,2017,39(01):56-75.

[12]汤春来.公司正义的制度认证与创新[J].法律科学.西北政法学院学报,2003(03):89-97.

[13]郭夏娟.为正义而辩:女性主义与罗尔斯[M].北京:人民出版社,2004:275.

[14] DAVIA T. Announcing CEO illness-best practices from buffett to jobs[EB/OL].(2012-04-18)[2023-05-04]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviatemin/2012/04/18/announcing-ceo-illness-best-practices-from-buffett-to-jobs/#791e4b6647a1.

[15]醋卫华.公司丑闻、声誉机制与高管变更[J].经济管理,2011,33(01):38-43.

[16]林林.比较法视野下的女性主义[M].长沙:湖南大学出版社,2016:168.

[17]唐灿,黄觉,薛宁兰.走向法治:工作场所性骚扰的调查与研究[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2012:125.

[18]李银河.妇女:最漫长的革命[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,1997:73.

[19] HEMEL D,LUNDD S. Sexual harassment and corporate law[J].Columbia law review,2018,118(06):1583-1680.

[20] PARKER C. How to win hearts and minds:corporate compliance policies for sexual harassment[J]. Law&policy,1999,21(01):21-48.

[21]骆东平.性骚扰纠纷解决机制研究[M].北京:人民出版社,2014:225.

[22]林建军.反对针对妇女歧视与暴力的跨学科研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2010:268.

[23]刘芳.中国性犯罪立法之现实困境及其出路研究[M].北京:东北大学出版社,2015:72-74.

[24]薛前强.质疑公司机会准则制度移植的法效果[J].湖北社会科学,2019(03):154-161.

[25]伯特兰·罗素.权威与个人[M].储智勇,译.北京:商务印书馆,2019:13.

(1)《中华人民共和国妇女权益保障法》第23条规定:“禁止违背妇女意愿,以言语、文字、图像、肢体行为等方式对其实施性骚扰。受害妇女可以向有关单位和国家机关投诉。”

(1) Dippert v Luxford&Anor (1996).

基本信息:

DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202108.2601

中图分类号:D923

引用信息:

[1]薛前强.论职场性骚扰行为的内部控制——以《民法典》1010条第2款具体构造与实施机制为核心[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024,42(05):184-195.DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202108.2601.

基金信息:

司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目(21SFB4050)

发布时间:

2023-06-13

出版时间:

2023-06-13

网络发布时间:

2023-06-13

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文